2009. Dir: Ethan and Joel Coen. Starring: Michael Stuhlbarg, Richard Kind, Fred Melamed, Sari Lennick and Aaron Wolff. ●●●●○
Book a ticket to see a Coen brothers film and you know that they will try to subvert your expectations, from the grim tone of No Country for Old Men to the celebrity smug off that was Burn after Reading, it's probably best to leave those expectations at the door and their latest, A Serious Man, proves the case. Whatever you have heard, whatever you imagin this film to be, it can only be appreciated or understood through actually seeing it for yourself.
It's a meditation about what it means to be Jewish, a parable about middle class complacency and a intelligent comedy about family and relationships. It manages to all these things, and yet comes across as nothing. It is both highly entertaining and fearlessly opaque - if you have to believe one thing you've read in the reviews then trust me this is a film the Coen's have made for themselves.
The film begins with an reenactment of a Jewish superstition. This may seem disconnected to the rest of the film, however it sets up the theme of bad things happening to good people - we don't know who the good person is in the prologue, this will depend on whether you believe the husband or the wife, but we know that good deeds lead to misfortune. Flash forward to the 1960's, not the counter culture we explored in Taking Woodstock but to the buttoned down suburbia that populates the rest of America.
We meet Larry Gopnik (Michael Stuhlbarg) an academic who is waiting for the decision on his tenure. Like the biblical Job he is being faced with a catalogue of appalling disasters, his wife is asking for a divorce, his brother is sleeping on the sofa and getting in trouble with the law, he is being blackmailed by a student, threatened by a neighbour and a hate-letter campaign is being raged against him.
Faced with an extraordinary amount of bad luck he attempts to seek advice from the Rabbis. Each of these visits is a new chapter during which the advice he is given either assists or confuses him.
The performances are perfect, Stuhlbarg internalises much of his emotion which makes him a fascinting comic stooge and Fred Melamed steals every scene he's in as Larry's patronising love rival. The set-up may seem far fetched but the writing is so on the button that you go along with the Coen's punishment for Gopnik and each fresh obstacle for the character seems organic. Although the open-ended finish seems to indicate a running out of ideas rather than a perfect way to leave our characters.
Technically the film is top rate with Jess Gonchor's production design striking that fine balance between period and lived in.
Overall this is the best comedy I've seen in 2009, and one of the most fascinating projects within the Coen's back catalogue.
The Oscar Shortlists for the 97th Academy Awards
13 hours ago
2 comments:
Hey there,
I agreed with your assessment in the second paragraph that the film comes across as nothing...and that the Coens made this for themselves.
In my humble opinion, I find the Coen's gleeful ridicule of characters with serious dilemmas and sincerely human foibles not to my personal taste...
In many ways I didn't see anything new here thematically, but I did find the scenes with the rabbis amusing and original.
I did enjoy moments in the movie, and I completely agree with you that the performances were perfect. Also, the photography is wonderful, and it often suggests the work of David Lynch, especially in the scenes with his seductive neighbor.
LOL...I made the same mistake I cautioned my readers against in my own journal..I thought you were going to review "A SINGLE Man", with which I had your film confused.
Great writing as always.....um...what is your name??
~Tom
Hi Tom,
The Coen's askew view of the major events in our lives can be troublesome. They do have a tendency to dehumanise characters or take a perverse pleasure in showing their misery.
In films like Intolerable Cruelty and The Man Who Wasn't There I have taken issue with the seemingly endless abuse they heap on the protagonists and yet continue to ridicule them through the personal issues they face.
Saying that, I felt that in Larry Gopnik we had a hero who was so accommodating to lifes woes, such a decent guy who didn't, until the closing minutes, begin to bend his moral position. Like the Biblical Job he doesn't begin by railing against God but by trying to find out why. And in using the parrallel with the prologue bad things just happen to good people.
I will probably review A Single Man when that comes out in mid-February. Release date differences between here and across the channel can make some of reviews seem horribly out of date - even when I'm keeping up with releases over here.
It's Ben, by the way.
Cheers
Post a Comment